Re:Humans display a few consistent behavioral phenotypes in ...
by gnulinux on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:38PM
(#26656426)
Tangential question: Not a native speaker but wouldn't "only a few" make more sense than "a few"? The paper title emphasizes the lack of great variety, as does "only a few", but without any more context "a few [...] phenotypes" could also mean "more phenotypes than anticipated"?
Re:Humans display a few consistent behavioral phenotypes in ...
by eximius on Thursday April 01, 2021 @12:38AM
(#26656731)
'a few' is fairly neutral to expectations and more speaks to the absolute number - of which 4 is 'a few'.
If the author wanted to emphasize that this was fewer than expected, 'only a few' would have been appropriate - but this might not have been their intent.
Re:Humans display a few consistent behavioral phenotypes in ...
by tjalfi on Thursday April 01, 2021 @09:19AM
(#26660128)
(submitter)
The title is quite close to the 80 character limit. I started with "only a few" but had to cut "only" after I replaced dyadic with two player. "dyadic" seemed too obscure to use in a HN title.
The actual title is "Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games". I shortened it to fit and replaced dyadic with "two player".