Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by hanniabu on Monday March 29, 2021 @05:20PM
(#26628300)
Since we're on the topic and I'm about to launch a static site, any thoughts on CDN performance between Github, Netlify, and Firebase?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by Trufa on Monday March 29, 2021 @05:43PM
(#26628578)
For frontend deployment nothing has come close to Netlify in my experience. It's a game changer product.
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by mxschmitt on Monday March 29, 2021 @06:27PM
(#26629082)
I personally use Vercel mostly. Didn't do much with Netfliy yet, both options should be fine.
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by dbrereton on Monday March 29, 2021 @07:11PM
(#26629493)
I was using Netlify but now prefer Render.
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by anurag on Monday March 29, 2021 @09:12PM
(#26630292)
Good to know! What made you switch?
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by janee on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @12:57AM
(#26631390)
We had to move off Netlify because of CDN performance for users in Africa.
Pretty niche requirement I know, but the TTFB was insane as it was serving traffic from Brazil at that time.
This was around June 2020, if I recall so maybe things have changed. Moved to Cloudflare for our CDN
Re:Show HN: An open-source, self-hostable Heroku and Netlify...
by tnolet on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @04:59AM
(#26632448)
Have a look at this. It lists the performance of many Jamstack / static site providers https://www.jamstackdeploy.com/