Re:USB 3.0* Radio Frequency Interference on 2.4 GHz Devices ...
by LeifCarrotson on Monday March 29, 2021 @05:02PM
(#26628129)
I think OP was using a rather consequentialist and capitalist economic model, where the value of a thing is by definition equal to the money that you can get for it on the open market.
If market rate were justified for everything then we wouldn't even have space reserved for HAMs.
> There's only one industry with enough demand and revenue to justify that purchase price, which is mobile.
There's plenty of industries with enough demand. There's just no way they can compete with the money that mobile offers. That's a damn shame given that money shouldn't be the only, nor even the main, driver.