Re:Tesla's EPA Driving Ranges Didn't Hold Up to Testing
by justin66 on Monday March 29, 2021 @02:59PM
(#26626656)
> 0-60 figures measured from a rolling start instead of dead stop
That's pretty normal. One magazine (I don't remember if it is one of the car magazines or Consumer Reports) offers both numbers, from a true standstill and with a slightly rolling start. The latter is much more common, I believe.
Re:Tesla's EPA Driving Ranges Didn't Hold Up to Testing
by 29083011397778 on Monday March 29, 2021 @11:29PM
(#26630997)
Hagarty has a program with Jason Cammisa where this was recently debunked as well [0]. Many manufacturers do this.
Re:Tesla's EPA Driving Ranges Didn't Hold Up to Testing
by cptskippy on Monday March 29, 2021 @04:54PM
(#26628032)
> range figures no one hits in the real world
I was curious so I looked...
Wikipedia[0] says the energy of a gallon of gas is 33.70 kWh and MPGe is:
(total miles driven) * (energy of one gallon of gasoline) / (total energy of all fuels consumed)
My Tesla Model 3 LR RWD has a government rating[1] of 130 MPGe, the odometer[2] reads 26,328 mi and 6,727 kWh: 26328 * 33.7 / 6727 = 131.89 MPGe
So I'm doing better than the rated MPGe. I don't hypermile either, my partner would kindly describe my driving as aggressive.[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_per_gallon_gasoline_equi...
[1] https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform...
I've seen a fair amount of professional testers/journalists reprimand them along the lines of "every manufacturer is guilty of this to some extent, but Tesla really ought to tone it down" (e.g. Alexander Bloch, who is generally very positive on the brand). As EV tech is commodifying swiftly and the competition closing in, I expect this to become a larger discussion.