EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green investment label: document

Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by p_l on Saturday March 27, 2021 @09:26PM (#26607223)

The reason why you don't see much of fast-neutron "burners" is that NPT is essentially an empty shell, and you have to be lucky to survive putting up so-called plutonium economy - and the "survive" part might be literal. It all goes back to Indian nuclear program, AFAIK, where reprocessing of plutonium from CANDU reactors was used to bootstrap nuclear warhead production. Now that climate crisis pushes for more solutions to power, you get absurd proposals from USA like reactors with remote disable on them controlled from USA.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by opo on Sunday March 28, 2021 @03:27AM (#26608633)

>...AFAIK, where reprocessing of plutonium from CANDU reactors was used to bootstrap nuclear warhead production.

No, India appears to ave gotten plutonium from a small research reactor, not a CANDU reactor (though it was provided by Canada):

>...The test used plutonium produced in the Canadian-supplied CIRUS reactor, and raised concerns that nuclear technology supplied for peaceful purposes could be diverted to weapons purposes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_and_weapons_of_mass_dest...

>...CIRUS (Canada India Reactor Utility Services)[1][2][3] was a research reactor at the Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) in Trombay near Mumbai, India. CIRUS was supplied by Canada in 1954, but used heavy water (deuterium oxide) supplied by the United States. It was the second nuclear reactor to be built in India. It was modeled on the Canadian Chalk River National Research X-perimental (NRX) reactor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIRUS_reactor

[ Parent | on HN ]