News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by consp on Saturday March 27, 2021 @04:21PM (#26605284)
That coal waste is also radioactive. Natural, but still radioactive.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by alexott on Saturday March 27, 2021 @04:50PM (#26605523)
Depending on location, it could be very radioactive... I studied and worked at lab that did measurements, and it was push for closing a nuclear plant in our city (in Siberia) for coal-based plant, but after evaluation of waste, it was decided to continue to use nuclear-based station.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by raffraffraff on Monday March 29, 2021 @04:08AM (#26618775)
The problem with coal waste is that most of it is in the atmosphere causing climate change. That might not seem like a storage problem but it is. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.

To me, it's like someone asking where me to choose which part of my house to infect with wood rot:

1. A single scrap of wood, extremely badly affected, stored in a sealed box under the stairs

2. My entire roof mildly affected by rot.

I'd take the box under the stairs.

Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by rpastuszak on Saturday March 27, 2021 @04:46PM (#26605501)
“Natural” as opposed to? :)
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by chrisseaton on Saturday March 27, 2021 @06:34PM (#26606215)
Natural as in naturally occurring. Coal is formed and burns in nature with no interaction from humans. Plutonium does not occur naturally in detectable quantities. It only does so through human action.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by XorNot on Saturday March 27, 2021 @11:19PM (#26607650)
Asbestos forms naturally too.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by chrisseaton on Saturday March 27, 2021 @11:23PM (#26607673)
Not sure what you’re trying to say? Asbestos is a natural mineral - not sure where you think that fits into this or how it’s relevant, sorry. We aren’t just listing all things that are naturally occurring!
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by XorNot on Sunday March 28, 2021 @09:07AM (#26610013)
It was implied in the parent context that the fact coal is "naturally" radioactive somehow matters to the fact that it is.

Asbestos is naturally occurring and incredibly dangerous. "natural" has nothing to do with risk to human life.

Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by chrisseaton on Sunday March 28, 2021 @09:11AM (#26610041)
> "natural" has nothing to do with risk to human life.

Not sure who you think you're disagreeing with? Nobody said otherwise if you read the thread.

Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by XorNot on Sunday March 28, 2021 @05:58PM (#26615074)
Then I have no idea it was necessary to talk about the "naturalness" of radioactive sources at all given the subject matter.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by consp on Monday March 29, 2021 @08:30AM (#26620567)
I usually give the "natural" qualification if it is not immediately obvious there are plenty of naturally occuring sources of radioactivity around us. This has mostly to so with human perception of radioactivity being something unnatural, maybe it was not necessary on HN. It does not matter that much in the end with respect to radioactivity.
Re:EU experts to say nuclear power qualifies for green inves... by godelski on Saturday March 27, 2021 @05:06PM (#26605631)
Plutonium is not a naturally occurring element. Plenty of stuff is man made.