News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:BPF for storage: an exokernel-inspired approach by monocasa on Saturday March 27, 2021 @12:59PM (#26603654)
WD and Seagate are their chip vendors. They design their own custom SoCs.
Re:BPF for storage: an exokernel-inspired approach by toolslive on Saturday March 27, 2021 @01:36PM (#26603903)
In case of Seagate's Kinetic Drives, one core was used by the controller, the other 'extra' CPU was used to manage a Key value store on the driver. These were ARM processors. I don't think they make these themselves.
Re:BPF for storage: an exokernel-inspired approach by monocasa on Saturday March 27, 2021 @02:46PM (#26604450)
You would be wrong. I work with guys who used to do SoC design for both Seagate and WD.

This is how WD was able to jump to RiscV so quickly; they didn't have any suppliers they needed to negotiate with, and the market for CortexR style in order, single issue, fully pipelined real time cores is sort of a commodity.

Re:BPF for storage: an exokernel-inspired approach by toolslive on Saturday March 27, 2021 @03:44PM (#26604974)
Well, that's why I was asking. Thx!