News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fairphone suggests Qualcomm is the biggest barrier to lon... by kevincox on Saturday March 27, 2021 @08:17AM (#26601776)
That may keep the phone working but that doesn't provide security updates. Only Qualcomm can provide security updates for the binary blobs, so if Qualcomm won't sell security updates past 3 years than no OEM can guarantee a secure phone for more than 3 years. Sure, they can update other components but I would be very upset if 3.5 years into my 5 year supported phone a CPU vulnerability was discovered that let apps get root.

So while in practice this is rare it means that longer updates can't be offered as a product feature, and if it can't be offered as a product feature than how does it help sell phones.

I'll tell you right now that if any somewhat reputable manufacturer promised 5 year support on an otherwise reasonable phone I would buy it (and 5 isn't even that much). I would even pay a bit more for it. The amount of environmental waste that is basically working phones that just need a couple of software patches is disgusting.

Re:Fairphone suggests Qualcomm is the biggest barrier to lon... by forty on Saturday March 27, 2021 @02:03PM (#26604097)
> I'll tell you right now that if any somewhat reputable manufacturer promised 5 year support on an otherwise reasonable phone I would buy it

I think that's exactly what Fairphone does. Sure they are not as big as Samsung, but they seem to be true to their word (I'm a happy FP3 customer, but to be honest I have much reasonable expectations for my phone than many :) )

Re:Fairphone suggests Qualcomm is the biggest barrier to lon... by bpye on Saturday March 27, 2021 @04:54PM (#26605552)
This was one of the big reasons my newest phone is an iPhone, not an Android phone. I am tired of buying new hardware every 2-3 years just to have a secure device.