Re:Why OO Sucks by Joe Armstrong (2000)
by PRINCE_PD on Friday March 26, 2021 @05:13AM
(#26590115)
Who has blocked whom is more natural to talk about when there is a primary object subjecting the other object to a test
It is more natural when you're already used to OOP, but like any language, each have its syntax which feels very natural for its speakers. Comparing the structure of a similar sentence in Japanese and English, would you affirm to the japaneses "the english sentense is more natural"? I don't think they would agree.
So your point about syntax is irrelevant. If you practice a language and love it, you'll embrace its syntax and it will feel very natural.
Objects map neatly to records
Well, some data structure maps even more neatly to records, no? {:id 1, :name 'bob'}
Most successful startups use OOP and there is a clear reason for that: It's more productive
I prefer not to waste time arguing with this, but programming is not about "successful startups".
Objects map neatly to records Well, some data structure maps even more neatly to records, no? {:id 1, :name 'bob'}
Most successful startups use OOP and there is a clear reason for that: It's more productive I prefer not to waste time arguing with this, but programming is not about "successful startups".