While we're at it, the 1956 Suez canal crisis marked the end of the traditional colonial powers when the USSR threatened to nuke London and Paris if they don't let Egypt regain control of the canal.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/yes-1956-suez-crisi...
Not egypt, but the Suez Canal company was was not the legitimate owner of the canal.
Interestingly, it was the disapproval of the US under Eisenhower that stopped the military action of Britain and France that ended their intervention. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Canal_Company
Seriously though that's pretty amazing.
Fun fact: corporations used to exist for a limit period of time, to solve a particular problem, and were then dissolved. With the introduction of indefinite corporations, we end up with cool setups like those /u/throwawaybutwhy has highlighted.
That's an interesting way to say tax evasion.
The term you’re looking for is “tax avoidance”.
1. The owner is Japanese
2. The operator is Taiwanese
3. The flag is Panamanian
4. The cargo is Chinese
5. The insurer is British
6. The crew is Indian
7. The canal is Egyptian and was built with forced labor by the French
8. The dredgers/salvage op managers are Dutch