Re:Removed gem breaks Rails ActiveStorage
by onli on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @02:30PM
(#26571191)
You are right, that's a shaky part and where insecurity is coming from - and sure, get a lawyer if you want more certainty. Depends where you are anyway. Better answers to that are already here. Just one thing:
> the original author didn't have the right to distribute it under the MIT license, so they (rails) never had a valid license.
Thing is, if it's really about a databasefile that was not copyrightable the gem author did have the right to distribute it. That's a happy circumstance of this specific case, making all of this less severe either way.
> the original author didn't have the right to distribute it under the MIT license, so they (rails) never had a valid license.
Thing is, if it's really about a databasefile that was not copyrightable the gem author did have the right to distribute it. That's a happy circumstance of this specific case, making all of this less severe either way.