News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by 9387367 on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @02:58PM (#26558870)
This thread has more votes (454 points) than any on the front page apart from number 1 (540 points) with more comments, 205 vs 118 from the top post.

As of now, it seats on the second page at #44.

Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by dencodev on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @04:01PM (#26559682)
It's currently flagged and not visible at all
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by anton96 on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @06:39PM (#26561238)
And interestingly, people still upvote this thread, it’s at 563 now.
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by onewhonknocks on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @03:09PM (#26559019)
Now at #93.
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by 9387367 on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @03:22PM (#26559185)
Perhaps HN should look into the weight of flagging, judging by #votes, seems like their ranking is not working or perhaps it is and they are happy this is not the top post.

Quite ironical, regardless as Reddit is a YC startup, none the less Paul Graham is the ideator and the post is about paid Reddit staff silencing users.

Edit: Now at 114 on the 4th page...

Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by frogpelt on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @03:30PM (#26559294)
If you're trying to create a discussion community where the least desirable outcome is controversial discussions/flame wars, high weight on flagging seems to be a good way to do it.

Of course, people flagging it might be thinking all kinds of things like "Why would a topic about what Reddit does be important here?"

Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by felipelemos on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @03:33PM (#26559341)
#128 for me now