News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by esja on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @02:58PM (#26558867)
I'm talking about someone I know who has been in precisely this situation.

You don't know anything about me, or that situation, but you are happy to accuse me of:

- Claiming to speak for lesbians - Spreading propaganda from bigots - Using "abuser tactics" - Having unexamined prejudices - Making prejudicial assumptions - Having no respect for trans people - Not engaging in good faith

I'd actually be really happy to discuss this topic in good faith, as it's important to someone I care about, and you clearly have a very different opinion. But I'd want you to read the HN guidelines first and make an effort to follow them.

Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by zozbot234 on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @02:55PM (#26558813)
> If you make blanket statements like “I’m not attracted to people of X group,” you likely have some unexamined prejudice

Does that also apply when the group is men/women (as opposed to AMAB/AFAB folks which would be the 'gender critical' view)? Should we all be pansexual?

[dead]
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by zozbot234 on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @03:26PM (#26559244)
What about lesbians who are concerned that some AMAB folks in their community might simply objectify them sexually, in a way that others would be a lot less likely to? Doesn't that seem like a good reason to be a bit warier when interacting with some group of people?
Re:Reddit is banning any Aimee Challenor mention. UK public ... by randomswede on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @04:41AM (#26564847)
There's quite a gap between "there are some women lesbian L would not date" and "all trans women are really men".