News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID by ppf on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:44AM (#26554342)
Given the sheer amount of potential profit at stake, it's not surprising that some skullduggery is happening. However, given the speed of the rollout of the various vaccines, and the corresponding number of people injected with them, the companies invovled should be absolutely above reproach in these matters.

The fact that, even when lives are at stake, companies cannot resist temptation, is why there are regulations. Try complaining about the regulations that were relaxed to allow this all to happen, however, and suddenly I'm an anti-vaxxer.

Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID by JamisonM on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:23AM (#26554647)
Is there any evidence of skullduggery?
Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID by ppf on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:52AM (#26554959)
I was responding to the parent comment that such headlines are just competing vaccine compaines attempting to destroy the reputation of their competitors. Assuming that is the reason behind this headline (which, is not a given), I'm just pointing out that would not be surprising.
Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID by JamisonM on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @10:33AM (#26555510)
So none then. Just wanted to be clear on that.
Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID by ppf on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @10:37AM (#26555561)
No, there is no evidence that this is anything else other than incompetence on the part of the vaccine developer.