Re:U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs Facebook appeal in user tracki...
by Invictus0 on Monday March 22, 2021 @09:48PM
(#26550018)
I found this:
> My understanding of the rule that has emerged from prior decisions is that there is a twofold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as "reasonable."
> My understanding of the rule that has emerged from prior decisions is that there is a twofold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as "reasonable."
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States