News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The S in IoT is for Security. Parent comment

Re:The S in IoT is for Security by tekromancr on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:44PM (#26544973)
I would totally be down for that, but I don't have access to the breaker box, and I don't feel like trying to install anything into anything that has hot wires.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The S in IoT is for Security by sokoloff on Monday March 22, 2021 @10:16PM (#26550230)
That’s smart policy.

In the US (or at least the majority of jurisdictions who have adopted it), NEC Section 240.24(B) requires "each occupant shall have ready access to all overcurrent devices protecting the conductors supplying that occupancy unless otherwise permitted in 240.24(B)(1)" (where that is roughly buildings with continuous on-site maintenance supervision can avoid this requirement).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The S in IoT is for Security by adriancr on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:02AM (#26554025)
Is that legal?

what do you do if you have a flooding? just hope you dont get electrocuted?

You should really insist on access...

[ Parent | on HN ]