News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click by echelon on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:46PM (#26544078)
My guess is that you're part of an unprofitable long tail. Why optimize for your use case when they can capture customers that bring more money with far less effort?

I wager that most people don't perceive a decline in search results quality. At least not to an extent where they'd notice and switch to using Bing.

Re:In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click by yakubin on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:54PM (#26544219)
Google Search users aren't Google's customers. Making Google Search useful to its users is not what makes it profitable. It only needs to be mildly better than the competition, so that people use it and can be used for collecting data and serving ads.

So GP may not be "an unprofitable long tail". GP may in fact be "a profitable typical long tail for whom Google Search is frustratingly unhelpful".

Re:In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click by remram on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:52PM (#26544198)
I'd be surprised if there was a long tail of customers. There is probably a long tail of searches for most customers.

Google giving up on difficult searches and focusing on showing promoted links, AMP sites, and "rich" result boxes is probably a sound business strategy too, and is unlikely to make users switch search engines this late in the game (Bing/DDG don't seem to do better anyway).

Re:In 2020, two thirds of Google searches ended without a click by spiritplumber on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:48PM (#26544134)
I'd guess because people who are looking for something specific, are more likely to buy the damn thing if they find it, if it's something buyable.