News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The S in IoT is for Security by crazypython on Monday March 22, 2021 @11:26AM (#26542171)
I can't imagine letting non-free software– the proprietor can modify it, but I can't, and under the control of someone else– hexing a piece of property I have bought. It's my property, yet it's cursed by the proprietor.
Re:The S in IoT is for Security by simias on Monday March 22, 2021 @11:41AM (#26542379)
I would be willing to compromise if at least there was a widely adopted set of standard protocols that I could use to interface these devices with my own favourite controller.

Instead it's a mish-mash of bespoke proprietary smartphone apps that have terrible security and privacy practices.

Re:The S in IoT is for Security by pwinnski on Monday March 22, 2021 @11:42AM (#26542398)
The Venn diagram of IoT devices with reasonable default security and IoT devices that are not proprietary does not overlap at all.

Apple makes IoT devices with reasonable default security, but they're also as proprietary as proprietary gets.