Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by honkdaddy on Monday March 22, 2021 @10:49AM
(#26541599)
Just to be clear, are you saying that you disagree with Stallman, that we _should_ morally define rape depending on the country it was committed in?
That is to say, if a 16yo had sex with an adult in Niagara Falls, ON where the age of consent is 16, then no moral crime had been committed, but if the two crossed over to New York where the law states 17, then the elder of the two is a rapist in your eyes? I believe that's the point Stallman was trying to make, and I'm curious to hear if you dsiagree.
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by Angostura on Monday March 22, 2021 @10:56AM
(#26541723)
The commenter is saying that the poster perhaps deliberately mischaracterised the actual complaints against Stallman to belittle the complaint and that's embarrassing.
That is to say, if a 16yo had sex with an adult in Niagara Falls, ON where the age of consent is 16, then no moral crime had been committed, but if the two crossed over to New York where the law states 17, then the elder of the two is a rapist in your eyes? I believe that's the point Stallman was trying to make, and I'm curious to hear if you dsiagree.