Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by exikyut on Monday March 22, 2021 @03:34AM
(#26537797)
What's both practically sad and scientifically ridiculously fascinating is that the cognitive dissonance goes both ways. See also, furry culture representation in general.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by Aloha on Monday March 22, 2021 @04:02AM
(#26537960)
I'm perfectly okay with us being presented as weird, it keeps the normal people away. ;-)
Did you mean something else?
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by exikyut on Monday March 22, 2021 @07:06AM
(#26539204)
I remember reading someone come to roughly the same conclusion on /r/furry a while back, it was nice. So yeah, I do mostly mean that.
But the reason there was a bit of extra hesitancy there is that I straddle the line on socialization to the extent that while half my brain would probably love going to a con, the other half would basically be cognitive-dissonance-BSODing the entire time. And I'm not sure if repeating "surrealism is art, surrealism is art" would be enough to get me through; I'd probably end up deciding those three specific people over there were safe and hiding behind them the entire time, while simultaneously responding mostly neurotypically to all the social-cue whooshes as I watched them happen. (The missed cues would be what I was hiding from.)
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF
by Aloha on Monday March 22, 2021 @12:10PM
(#26542775)
Fandom interactions have their own well defined rules and norms. I apply one rulebook for fandom, another one for work, another one for non fandom friendly social interactions, just pondering it lightly, I can identify 6 or so unique rulebooks I use for different kinds of social interactions. I suspect I have even more.