I can has reference? Sounds genuinely interesting, and that info didn't find its way through the rock I'm apparently under.
First, we don't know that. Second, it doesn't matter even if they are not using it in any way. Backblaze shouldn't be sending this data to FB. And lastly, even if FB isn't using it in any way today, how do we know they won't use in future?
Nobody should be having access to any data that they don't absolutely need. It doesn't matter how mundane the data is, which company the data is going to, etc etc.
Like I said, it's definitely a problem regardless.
But this is like saying it that if you misplace your cell phone, it doesn't matter whether you left it in your friend's car or a taxi. Of course it matters whether or not data is being (mis)used.
You mean other than storing them forever?
Are there audits to check compliance?
FB used 2FA phone numbers for spying, after repeatedly promising that they will be not used in this way.
See also FB promises about WhatsApp during merger.
Is there a truly independent confirmation?
Isn't there a lawsuit or similar going through the EU courts atm about Facebook not really being GDPR compliant? eg They claim they are, but the court case is about them not being.