News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by krschultz on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @12:10PM (#2653577)
This is one of the casualities of the Bitcoin monetary policy.

(Obviously I'm simplifying, your money gets pooled with others and deposits and withdrawls happen from a pool of money, you don't get your own money back when you withdraw, but lets compare two hypothetical banks with only 1 customer each)

A dollar denominated bank takes your money and invests it. They use it for mortgages, or they put it in bond markets or equity markets. They make a profit. Some of that profit gets returned to you as interest. They also provide for safe keeping of the money. With interest rates near zero, we forget this, but thats the real reason for a bank. If it was just a safe place to keep money, we'd be paying them.

A Bitcoin bank couldn't work. You give them some Bitcoins. They transfer them to dollars, make some investments. Now you go to withdraw some money and they have to sell the investments. Since Bitcoins are deflationary, they can not make you whole without incurring a loss. There is no money to be made in operating a Bitcoin bank and giving interest so long as the exchange rate of Bitcoins to the real world keeps going the way its going. Everyone should just sit on their bitcoins and hold them.

Now if you just want to make a safe deposit box for Bitcoins, that's would work. And you would have to pay a fee. But there is a difference between a bank account and a safe deposit box, and I don't see bank accounts working with bitcoin any more so than they would have worked based on tulip bulbs in the 80s.

Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by geon on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @06:03PM (#2654966)
> You give them some Bitcoins. They transfer them to dollars

It should work just fine if they do the investments in Bitcoins.

Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by drblast on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @12:57PM (#2653767)
What you described is not how banks or money work.

Below is an entertaining, albeit slightly alarmist, educational video on how the money system works today. This should be required viewing for anyone considering using money:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVkFb26u9g8

Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by thomasz on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @01:40PM (#2653928)
I don't want to risk wasting 45 minutes listening to a crackpot, and honestly, there are quite a few indicators for lunacy in the first few minutes. Can you give a few bullet points to help me decide if it's worth to watch?
Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by nhaehnle on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @04:43PM (#2654670)
I haven't checked the video (can't watch it here), but there are indeed many misconceptions about how the banking system operates.

In particular, banks do not lend out deposits, at least not in any meaningful way, and the so-called money multiplier is non-existent.

To get up to speed on such things, I would recommend the blogs of economics professor Bill Mitchell. His style is a bit rambling without much polish, since he writes one entry every day, but I found it very worthwhile for getting a deeper understanding. Consider looking for entries with "money multiplier" in the title in the index here: http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?page_id=1667

Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by drblast on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @05:49PM (#2654928)
It talks about the history of banking and the fractional reserve system, the difference between commercial and central bank money.

What most people don't realize is that banks don't have to actually have the money they lend out. That's the basis for our monetary system and while it has nice qualities, like spurring innovation, there are some undeniable drawbacks.

Re:Computer compromise leads to theft of bitcoins valued at ... by anigbrowl on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @07:01PM (#2655182)
You know these concepts are explained in any first-year economics textbook, yes?