News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by moistly on Sunday March 21, 2021 @05:26PM (#26534237)
I suppose one can “brag” about most anything. Seems to me, though, that a brag about “owning” an arbitrary sequence of bytes is pretty damn empty.

Overcome a challenge that presses your personal limitations? Worthy of a brag: you took up the task, persevered, and conquered.

Open your wallet to purchase something? I just don’t see that there’s any legitimate boasting to be had there: any damn fool with the same money could do it. There is no challenge, there is no accomplishment, there is nothing to be proud of at all. It’s such empty bragging.

IMO people who brag about owning things have deep personal insecurities and would be better off putting the money spent towards therapy.

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by koonsolo on Sunday March 21, 2021 @06:48PM (#26534885)
Having a unique and quirky item is worth a brag.

Bragging with an expensive Rolex is very different than bragging with the NFT of a terrible image of the Brooklyn Bridge by John Cleese who sold it as a joke.

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by dexterdog on Sunday March 21, 2021 @07:47PM (#26535214)
Except there is nothing unique about it.
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by moistly on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:38AM (#26537504)
Nor anything unique about a Rolex. Can’t see how a purchased watch qualifies for bragging. It takes no skill, no dedication, no smarts, no gumption to open one’s wallet to purchase a watch.

The person who built the watch might have something to brag about.

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by dexterdog on Monday March 22, 2021 @04:39PM (#26546641)
A Rolex is an actual thing with a function and an intrinsic value. It can be copied, but only at a significant cost.
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by evilDagmar on Sunday March 21, 2021 @11:03PM (#26536430)
John Cleese has done how many pieces of architectural art now?
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by qeternity on Sunday March 21, 2021 @07:36PM (#26535149)
> Open your wallet to purchase something? I just don’t see that there’s any legitimate boasting to be had there: any damn fool with the same money could do it.

The item isn’t the brag. The purchase is. People don’t buy Rolxes because because it doesn’t anything radically different than a $50 watch. They buy it because it tells people they have money. That’s what art is. That’s what NFT is.

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by jancsika on Sunday March 21, 2021 @08:42PM (#26535537)
> That’s what NFT is.

Yeah, but who gives a shit whether it's centralized or not?

If some intrepid reporter figured out that NFT has a backdoor that means it is being controlled as a-- god forbid-- centralized service, what bad thing happens to the dipshit who paid a million dollars for Rick and Morty digital art?

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by qeternity on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:56AM (#26537603)
I agree with you 100%.
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by AshWolfy on Sunday March 21, 2021 @11:02PM (#26536428)
I cant think of anything more depressing than saying art is showing off you have money.
Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by koonsolo on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:14AM (#26537361)
Do you think the person that buys a Picasso is:

A) The world biggest fan of Cubism and a lifelong fan of Picasso.

B) A person with a shitload of money, that has nowhere else to put the money than in some famous artwork.

Re:John Cleese Sells the Brooklyn Bridge as an NFT by qeternity on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:57AM (#26537612)
I am not saying that all art is like this. But I am saying that a large part of the fine arts world is like this.