News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI and Drug Discovery: Attacking the Right Problems by ta988 on Saturday March 20, 2021 @12:07PM (#26524050)
You are right I assigned to malice what is probably just lack of skills and knowledge. Your are also right on the fact that what works is grind and find. You can do it at the scale of one lab or the scale of many labs, but in the end what works is to try a lot of things because we are still really shooting in the dark for a lot of targets or diseases we don't know any druggable target yet.
Re:AI and Drug Discovery: Attacking the Right Problems by ramraj07 on Saturday March 20, 2021 @12:16PM (#26524122)
I’ll propose that we actually kind of know a lot of things about many (not all) diseases, we really just need an objective look at how to address them. The majority of scientists today are mostly quite narrow minded in terms of scientific thinking, every one of them wants to use the method that they are experts at to solve the problem. When the Manhattan project was deployed all the top physicists came and tackled the problem that needed to be solved with the most suitable methods, but there’s been “cancers Manhattan project” or “moonshot” initiatives in biology numerous times and they all fail because the scientists incharge invariably push their own agendas in these.

Take Janelia farms for example- without reading their editorialised website if you try to gander what the hell this institution is trying to do, from just the papers they publish, you would fail miserably. Not saying that institution sucks, well I suppose I am saying that, but only insofar because all of academia seems to suck in the same way.

Re:AI and Drug Discovery: Attacking the Right Problems by an_opabinia on Sunday March 21, 2021 @01:44AM (#26528367)
> Janelia farms

I’m pretty sure they do basic science for medicine, with many of the same goals as the NIH.