Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by computerex on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:39PM
(#26519672)
Keep in mind that Tesla's approach for solving FSD still uses mathematics that's fundamentally half a century old and is by definition narrow AI, not AGI.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by visarga on Saturday March 20, 2021 @02:33AM
(#26521239)
> uses mathematics that's fundamentally half a century old
I have news for you, the most common operations in AlphaGo, GPT-3 or any state of the art AI are: multiplication, addition, max, log, exp, sin, cos and random - all functions known for centuries.
It's the architecture, data and the compute that are making the difference, not the math, and all three are recent accomplishments.
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by computerex on Saturday March 20, 2021 @04:59AM
(#26521736)
Yes, that's my point. That neural networks were conceptualized roughly half a decade ago. Obviously there have been a lot of advancements like convolution, drop out, attention, deep learning, etc. But fundamentally this is old mathematics and while it's yielding good results at solving specific problems, it's not the answer for AGI. For AGI we will need new breakthroughs.
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by computerex on Monday March 22, 2021 @04:37PM
(#26546615)
century ago**
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by rafale on Saturday March 20, 2021 @02:04AM
(#26521127)
Exactly. Tackling AGI will require imo a significant breakthrough in the field of AI.
Meanwhile, it's much more productive and practical to look into how we can instrument our cities to make self driving cars possible with today's technology.