News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous. Parent comment

Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by morpheos137 on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:21PM (#26519542)
Waymo is a joke outside a trained, geofenced area. It is fascinating to me how a company went from gee we can index search results and sell ads to we can solve one of the hardest general automation problems in the world.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by AlotOfReading on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:53PM (#26519753)
It's not designed to work without the map/geofence, so why is this your critique? Do you also judge fish for their crappy tree climbing?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by tzs on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:28PM (#26519595)
It’s not the same people there doing search and doing self-driving.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by notJim on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:27PM (#26519583)
I think Google are basically just the funders, the actual leaders on the project seem to be engineers with strong AI backgrounds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by morpheos137 on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:28PM (#26519600)
AI does not exist.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by olaf on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:51PM (#26519745)
AI exists, but not necessarily Artificial Intelligence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous by morpheos137 on Friday March 19, 2021 @09:20PM (#26519909)
As a marketing term yeah.
[ Parent | on HN ]