Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by ipnon on Thursday March 18, 2021 @04:38PM
(#26507288)
Cyber security should be seen as integral to national security as an army or navy. A cyber force is as necessary in the 21st century as a space force.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by ethbr0 on Thursday March 18, 2021 @05:28PM
(#26507753)
Cyber anything isn't the solution.
The solution is best practices, succinctly expressed, regularly updated, and loosely expressed but tightly enforced over years.
Because tomorrow's device environment is not bought today. It's bought today-and-every-day-for-the-past-30-years.
And securing the entire environment is the key goal.
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by PeterisP on Thursday March 18, 2021 @06:55PM
(#26508407)
The problem with that is that practical cyber security is essentially about the "structural soundness" of a huge infrastructure that's mostly civilian and mostly private, about the resilience of private company internal systems and consumer products - a "cyber force" (no matter how strong or large) has neither authorisation nor practical ability to come in the servers and systems of every important private organization (some large, some quite small - e.g. municipal water infrastructure orgs whose "IT" is a contractor booked for a couple hours per week) and change them so that they'd be more defensible.
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by _-david-_ on Thursday March 18, 2021 @04:50PM
(#26507397)
There is already a cyber force. It is called Cyber Command
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by Rebelgecko on Thursday March 18, 2021 @05:33PM
(#26507805)
A unified command is different than an actual branch of the military
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by TameAntelope on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:22PM
(#26508629)
Is it actually important to have a dedicated branch? I legitimately don't know the benefits/drawbacks.
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by ipnon on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:48PM
(#26508828)
As it is now, each service branch has their own cyber operations and command structure for them, and they are all beholden to the central cyber command for strategic coordination. But how the day to day is played out is determined by each branch by itself.
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by Rebelgecko on Thursday March 18, 2021 @09:10PM
(#26509279)
There's pros and cons so it depends on who you ask
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by Orochikaku on Friday March 19, 2021 @02:46AM
(#26510645)
This is quite literally true for anything and everything and frankly adds nothing to this thread
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by realityking on Friday March 19, 2021 @09:46AM
(#26513252)
Interestingly north Norway (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Cyber_Defence_Forc...) and Germany (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_and_Information_Domain...) have created cyber branches in their armed forces as peers to the traditional Army/Navy/Air Force branches. Iām curious how this will play out.
Re:U.S. Government Finally Gets Serious About IoT Security
by marshmallow_12 on Thursday March 18, 2021 @06:52PM
(#26508385)
I would argue that it's orders of magnitudes more necessary than a Space Force. after decades of relatively slow advancement, i fail to see why it's vital in 2021 to dedicate an entire branch of the military to space. An area which they have virtually no access to. OTOH, cyber warfare is very real, available and probably more effective then anything short of nuclear warfare.