I just want to be clear – I said it is a small, vocal minority on the right. Most of "the right" rejected the MAGA conspiracy theories and stopped supporting the FUD. As I have pointed out, even a lot of the mainstream right-wing media has started to "deplatform" people who continue speaking about this "problem". The Supreme court and other courts have thrown out 98% of all the cases, after applying rules of standing and evidence [1].

After all that money came in to campaign promising to "fight for every LEGAL vote to be counted", Giuliani never even applied to the supreme court. A lot of it seems to have been about taking in massive amounts of money (up to 1 billion dollars) from faithful Trump voters via the campaigns. Giuliani distanced himself from Sidney Powell who actually wanted to go to the supreme court, seemingly in order to not share the large sums of cash coming in from MAGA supporters.

Also, I am not "a dem". You assume too much.

And btw, many people on the right, including social conservatives and fiscal conservatives, are also very critical of the Republican leadership. Here is far more information about why[2].

1. https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-pennsylvan...

2. https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-people-believe-Republicans...

Again, if you’re focusing on the lawsuits you’ve missed the point. Are you aware there is an extreme left bias online? Knowing that, and today’s extreme cancel culture can you explain why you’re not seeing more people talk about this? Even here on HN these posts have support, until dems downvote it beyond the upvotes. There’s that bias!

Meanwhile in actual face to face conversations people can’t stop talking about it. Some have given up out of desperation but pointing to lack of media culture and deplatforming does nothing but support the claims and issues i’m pointing out.

> Are you aware there is an extreme left bias online?

Evidence please.

I am aware that 'left bias' is a consistent lie perpetuated by right-wing media, which contradicts at least twenty years of research on the subject, e.g.

https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/07/twitters-not-shadow-bannin...

https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/platform-bias.php

https://web.archive.org/web/20031230091158/http://www.whatli...

> Knowing that, and today’s extreme cancel culture...

I would highly recommend taking a course on logic and critical thinking. In particular regarding the "principle of explostion" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

> Even here on HN these posts have support, until dems downvote it beyond the upvotes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

> Meanwhile in actual face to face conversations people can’t stop talking about it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_bias

> Are you aware there is an extreme left bias online? Evidence please.

And I need to take a class in logic....

>> > Even here on HN these posts have support, until dems downvote it beyond the upvotes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

So you watch the votes and downvotes come in? Before the downvote parade I had near 10 upvotes, net result after dems, -20. Clearly this is a conspiracy.

> Meanwhile in actual face to face conversations people can’t stop talking about it.

So instead your sampling bias is correct? Where is your evidence?