News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days by dmos62 on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:20AM (#26501523)
It's not being pedantic, but accurate. It took me a confusing 30 seconds to understand that the gorrilas won't be coming home with the owners of Reddit.
Re:WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days by tokai on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:48AM (#26501682)
You not knowing the common usage of the word adopt in charity work doesn't make you accurate.
Re:WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days by dmos62 on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:57AM (#26501734)
Ok, if we're getting pedantic about it, adopting as a synonym for supporting is a misnomer or more specifically an attempt to conceal the conflict of wanting to support something, but being unwilling to become intimately involved with it. It takes away from the genuine act of adoption. So I'll stand behind not using the term.
Re:WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days by jowsie on Thursday March 18, 2021 @08:38AM (#26502012)
That just feels pedantic and gatekeeping. Adoption in this context has been used this way for as long as I can remember (20+ years) with every animal charity in the UK at least.
Re:WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days by dmos62 on Thursday March 18, 2021 @08:49AM (#26502118)
That's a fair point, as regards animal support. I was a bit hot under the collar when I wrote that. The scenario I was thinking of was adopting vs supporting people, and the regretable reluctance to adopt children in general.