Re:AXR: A better(?) alternative to HTML+CSS
by veosotano on Monday June 13, 2011 @09:46AM
(#2648977)
Suggestions on how to improve the phrasing of the website are always welcome :D
I'd love to hear if, once you've read through the spec you still feel that the features are perceivably as complex as C++... I think they feel very naturally into the language, but then again, I designed it, so your mileage may vary ;)
Ew. This is an advertisement? Elegance is usually achieved when you hit a maximum of capabilities with a minimum of explicitly defined features. The last thing you want is so many different constructs that when someone reads your code they have to keep a reference manual handy.
Granted, I haven't worked my way through the spec, but maybe there's a better way to phrase that sentence that doesn't evoke memories of C++.