Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by dataflow on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @06:40AM
(#26489117)
Which directly contradicts the article saying it was T-Mobile...
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by homero on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @06:43AM
(#26489134)
Well that's what he's claiming https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26488898 paid article
I want to know who is right wealthyyy or Lucky225
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by dataflow on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @06:46AM
(#26489154)
Well that's why I'm pushing back against it. I very much want to know too. So far, given wealthyyy is a 5-day-old account making so many serious accusations of dishonesty [1] [2] against a Vice reporter without a shred of evidence, it should be obvious who has more credibility right now.
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by wealthyyy on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @08:23AM
(#26490064)
I don't give ....
Well what. It's obvious who you are. You are Lucky...
Account age is biased way to trust an individual. I could have bought an old HN account from someone but I didn't.
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by wealthyyy on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @07:16AM
(#26489445)
Look, Any Vice reporter can be bribed. You're missing the point.
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by dataflow on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @07:18AM
(#26489463)
You accuse people of dishonesty so easily and don't feel any need to show a single shred of evidence supporting your position?
Re:Can We Stop Pretending SMS Is Secure Now?
by wealthyyy on Wednesday March 17, 2021 @08:05AM
(#26489895)
Mr Flow, Please try a TMobile number on ZipWhip. You will see it fails.
You will now claim that I am lying and that NetNumber has fixed this. So there is nothing I can do to help you.
I have known about this attack since 2012, but I did not publicly talk about how insecure SMS is for promoting an anti-fraud product.
Note, this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are other attack vectors that only I know!
Update: So his allegation is there is no reporter supposedly and it's a paid article.