News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straightforward than Linux's. Parent comment

Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by MaxBarraclough on Sunday March 14, 2021 @07:44AM (#26454547)
If a system is highly latencyant, does that mean it performs well in terms of latency, or does it mean it exhibits high latency?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by bboreham on Sunday March 14, 2021 @09:49AM (#26455385)
I was thinking “lower latency”. Is there a suffix that means “less of”? “Timeless” is already taken...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by yesenadam on Sunday March 14, 2021 @10:56PM (#26462143)
Well, there are hypo- and hyper-.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by bboreham on Monday March 15, 2021 @05:48AM (#26464061)
Now I like hypolatent and throughputful.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by wongarsu on Sunday March 14, 2021 @11:20AM (#26456112)
latencyless and throughputful?

latencyette and throughputous?

latencycule and throughputty?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig... by gfody on Sunday March 14, 2021 @12:22PM (#26456538)
what about hit rate and time and space efficiency? i think "cachy" says it all - the cachiest cache
[ Parent | on HN ]