Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig...
by CyberRabbi on Sunday March 14, 2021 @04:49AM
(#26453712)
FYI “problematic” is also a vague and essentially meaningless term that is no more specific than “bad.”
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig...
by johncolanduoni on Sunday March 14, 2021 @09:38AM
(#26455302)
English has lots of words that mean mostly the same thing. Do you seethe at every entry in a thesaurus? How does one determine which word is blessed by the higher minded beings you choose to exclusively associate with?
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig...
by CyberRabbi on Sunday March 14, 2021 @12:24PM
(#26456552)
I don’t usually seethe, it’s more like remote embarrassment. I think there is a German word for that. I often recommend a “non-hire” as well.
Edit: I changed “non hire” to “non-hire” because I have no personal issue with acknowledging my usage of improper punctuation. Why should it be controversial to point out usage of improper vocabulary in others?
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig...
by mlyle on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:01PM
(#26456812)
FYI, non-hire is the type of phrase that should be hyphenated.
Re:Multigenerational LRU: more performant, versatile, straig...
by mlyle on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:00PM
(#26456801)
Problematic is just fine, brah-- with usage dating to the late 17th century and with a pretty clear connotation of "presenting numerous problems" instead of just being undesirable/bad.
It's not wrong, but it's best avoided if you want to avoid pedants waving their King's English stick at you.