Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by TedDoesntTalk on Saturday March 13, 2021 @03:40PM
(#26449793)
For anyone clicking through and scrolling to page 37: this is in Hebrew, not English. I don’t see an English translation there.
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by dogma1138 on Saturday March 13, 2021 @04:38PM
(#26450230)
That’s not Hebrew technically either it uses the Phoenician alphabet or a variation of it.
I can read the Dead Sea scrolls I can’t read what ever this is :(
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by marshmallow_12 on Saturday March 13, 2021 @06:08PM
(#26451026)
it is Hebrew, just in a now defunct script. I didn't see anything majorly informative in the transcription, in case you were wondering.
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by dogma1138 on Saturday March 13, 2021 @07:16PM
(#26451498)
Well it’s not Hebrew, the Hebrew alphabet is based on Aramaic in fact it’s essentially identical to “square” aka western Aramaic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Neo-Aramaic
Before that proto/paleo-Hebrew used the same Canaanite scripts that were common in the region, the closest thing we have to that today is Samaritan.
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by Perenti on Saturday March 13, 2021 @10:31PM
(#26452554)
Pre-captivity Hebrew used the Phoenician alphabet, post exile the Chaldean (square) one.
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by cwzwarich on Saturday March 13, 2021 @07:36PM
(#26451604)
Even in rabbinic Hebrew, the name for this script is כתב עברי (Hebrew writing), and the name for the script used today is כתב אשורית (Assyrian writing).
Re:Is a long-dismissed forgery the oldest known Biblical man...
by marshmallow_12 on Sunday March 14, 2021 @05:32AM
(#26453894)
i meant that Hebrew has several scripts.
http://images.library.wisc.edu/WI/EFacs/transactions/WT1958/...