Re:Receiving SpaceX Falcon 9 Telemetry with a HackRF and 1.2...
by sandworm101 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @02:08PM
(#26427741)
Obscurity is about hiding amongst the noise. I describe physical network separation, essentially air-gapping. Do we encrypt the signal between a car's brake pedal and the brakes? Why not? It is a very important network that could result in loss of life. We don't encrypt because the network is physically separate from attackers. If they are tapping into your car's internal wiring then they could kill you in any number of easier ways. A rocket tuned to only listen to emitters from specific locations need not encrypt because it is also physically separated from potential attackers. So in high-reliability systems if encryption/authentication only offers protection in hypothetical edge cases where the attackers is co-located with controllers, but presents any additional complications, it won't be employed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Receiving SpaceX Falcon 9 Telemetry with a HackRF and 1.2...
by perl4ever on Friday March 12, 2021 @07:42AM
(#26435167)
>We don't encrypt because the network is physically separate from attackers.
Given the existence in modern vehicles of:
- a shared bus for communication amongst the processing units
- autonomous emergency braking being fairly standard
and
- network connectivity being available in some cases
I think your analogy might be outdated.