Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by kibwen on Thursday March 11, 2021 @10:59AM
(#26425412)
Art auctions, the favorite money laundering scheme of the rich, meets cryptocurrency, the second-favorite money laundering scheme of the rich. A match made in heaven.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by cannabis_sam on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:30AM
(#26425821)
At least crypto has critics, art has been abused by the rich for centuries, yet few people gives a fuck...
(Just to be clear, I don’t disagree with you)
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by dagmx on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:43AM
(#26425993)
Art sales have been criticized too. It's just they generally are dismissed as some high falutin nonsense whereas crypto is more accessible by folks in other domains.
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by bronak1 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:29AM
(#26425801)
Theres way better ways to launder money...I think you might be thinking of tax evasion.
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by weaksauce on Thursday March 11, 2021 @12:10PM
(#26426354)
Art is a great way to launder money for the ultra rich. It's a pretty widely known scheme covered over and over again. here's one sample: https://www.forbes.com/2003/04/08/cx_0408hot.html
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by jl2718 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:32AM
(#26425837)
I don’t see how this could work, at least with US tax law.
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by kkielhofner on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:46AM
(#26426028)
When it comes to tax evasion ("avoision") there is no limit of creativity.
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by DamnYuppie on Thursday March 11, 2021 @11:52AM
(#26426109)
But tax avoidance isn't illegal, this has been tested many times in the US courts.
Re:Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70M at Christie's
by kkielhofner on Thursday March 11, 2021 @12:06PM
(#26426303)
I'm aware of that (hence the parens and quotes) but I was more referring to what could probably best be understood as "common understanding", that is to say that a large portion of the population would probably be shocked at the kind of sophisticated avoision strategies that have been deployed to minimize tax liability.
The average Joe doesn't declare $100 in income - evasion.
The ultra wealthy don't get taxed on $100,000,000 in income - avoision.