Re:The technical interview practice gap
by collyw on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @03:23AM
(#26409067)
That's also why there is so much shit software out these. Small companies saving money initially by using inexperienced developers. Then once it is making money they need to hire a load of seniors to clean up the mess. (Though plenty of seniors are capable of overengineering a mess as well)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The technical interview practice gap
by blacktriangle on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @08:33AM
(#26411009)
Another way of reading your statement: That's also why there is SO MUCH shit software out there.
If small companies weren't able to use inexperienced developers to spin up half-assed MVPs, we'd be at the mercy of whatever large companies are interested in developing, and time has shown that as companies get bigger, they lose interest in niches in favor of products that will be massive successes.
You're not wrong, but I also don't think the world you are describing is a problem.
> If small companies weren't able to use inexperienced developers to spin up half-assed MVPs, we'd be at the mercy of whatever large companies are interested in developing
That's an interesting perspective. I would say there is some truth in it, but a lot of small companies get plenty of investment money.
Re:The technical interview practice gap
by blacktriangle on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @02:46PM
(#26415296)
But then you just ignored the whole micro-ISV market which is cranking out tons of software solving interesting problems.
And investment money has its own issues. VCs view their companies as a portfolio, they are only interested in ideas that have the potential to be huge. There are plenty of software products that should exist but are not interesting to investors because they are not potential unicorns, but interesting to smaller software shops since that revenue will provide a nice living for them.