News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by jedc on Friday August 01, 2008 @12:45PM (#264173)
I LOVE the analogue meter. Very retro...
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by superchink on Friday August 01, 2008 @12:20PM (#264141)
That is a freakin' awesome setup! I love the bears and the monitoring displays in the operations room.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by soundsop on Friday August 01, 2008 @07:17PM (#264611)
Is the analog response-time meter in units of deciseconds?
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by DavidSJ on Friday August 01, 2008 @09:34PM (#264680)
Seems so. It says "(ds)" underneath it. And judging by their site's responsiveness, it certainly doesn't seem to be milliseconds.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by akd on Saturday August 02, 2008 @06:41PM (#265256)
You're saying that last.fm has a 15 second response time?
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by DavidSJ on Saturday August 02, 2008 @07:41PM (#265280)
No, 150 deciseconds would be 1.5 seconds.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by alex_c on Sunday August 03, 2008 @12:08AM (#265387)
That would be centiseconds :p
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by akd on Saturday August 02, 2008 @08:36PM (#265301)
I hope you don't work for NASA :)
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by DavidSJ on Wednesday August 13, 2008 @12:41PM (#275136)
Oh, whoops.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by jfornear on Friday August 01, 2008 @09:38PM (#264687)
That would be awesome to work at Last.fm... Live in London and get payed in Euros! :D
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by jonknee on Saturday August 02, 2008 @11:59AM (#265025)
They don't use Euros in London.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by jfornear on Saturday August 02, 2008 @08:31PM (#265298)
Pounds... even better? You knew what I meant.

The atmosphere here makes you not want to bother posting sometimes to avoid being thrashed by nitpicks

Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by akd on Sunday August 03, 2008 @03:12AM (#265461)
Computer people put a high value on precision because a single semicolon is the difference between a working Linux kernel and a jumble of compile-time errors.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by notauser on Saturday August 02, 2008 @04:16PM (#265170)
Some places take them... at a punitive exchange rate :)
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by talkeinan on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:46AM (#264836)
simply cool
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by ian on Friday August 01, 2008 @06:58PM (#264606)
Fresh!
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by agentbleu on Friday August 01, 2008 @12:21PM (#264143)
Its all good and all and hazardously I say the word 'top'.
Re:Last.fm Blog: Quality Control by Dobbs on Friday August 01, 2008 @05:43PM (#264530)
Top is an amazing tool, don't get me wrong but its very limited. The major flaw of top (and its not really a flaw) is that Top is limited to one machine. When you have a cluster of say 20-300 you need more powerful tools.

Also top doesn't measure things like the current latency and other things they need to know at the moment.