We're sorry to hear you've got a bad taste in your mouth from our pricing page, I'll have to rethink how we present this. By "limited advertisement", we generally mean less than the competitors (no forced watermark at the bottom of your site), but there's no examples to demonstrate that. You make valid points about how we can better present our features to interested users - and we certainly don't want to hide anything.
At this time, we plan to keep custom domains free and charge on a per-profile basis, however we might end up having different tiers of custom domain support (one might be simpler than the other to setup).
Additionally, I will add that we've made all the features available in our paid tiers available free in our Github for those that decide to self-host. Our eventual goal is for the community marketplace (when monetized) to generate enough revenue to reduce paywalls on features and limit monetization mainly to marketplace purchases, but we'll see what traction we can get. In retrospect, I could emphasize these more on the website.
I hope I made myself clear! Again, I really appreciate the feedback, and we'll keep these in mind as we make changes of the next week! :)
Not only does it put a bad taste in my mouth (it looks like you're trying to obscure the fact that free has ads), a quick scan of the pricing page doesn't illuminate why I'd want to pay $8/mo for the next tier (which would remove the ads, I take it?).
It's also unclear if free supports using your own domain or not. The pricing page should probably make it a lot plainer that you pay to get a custom domain and no ads if that's indeed the case.
EDIT: The singlel.ink domain is a nice domain hack but the period breaks it in a weird place and I bet you're going to run into issues with it confusing people and them putting the dot in the wrong place.