News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The technical interview practice gap by pydry on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @05:19PM (#26405153)
I prefer homebrewed technical interviews. They can be customized to the needs of the company hiring and can reflect day to day work better.

Treating engineering as an undifferentiated commodity measured by leetcode performance is partly why this charade exists.

Re:The technical interview practice gap by vsareto on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:58PM (#26406112)
Neither leetcode nor homebrewed are what we want anyway. But homebrewed is IMO worse because it could be a weird format and people have issues with surprises during technical interviews, least of all anxiety. And when there's a bunch of different flavors and formats, candidates either prepare for them all or accept that they won't do well at some formats and forgo those jobs.
Re:The technical interview practice gap by pydry on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @04:49AM (#26409584)
IME candidates are spooked way more by leetcode than homebrewed tests that mimic the job they do every day.

I'd estimate (from browsing graduate boards) it's probably among the top 5 most hated aspects of the industry. #1 for many - because it's so anxiety inducing.

Re:The technical interview practice gap by vsareto on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @02:37PM (#26415205)
Your experience must be different than mine then, which, it's a large field so it's totally possible. Dunno, it'd be great to not have to repeat any kind of technical test, regardless of the format preferred.