News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The technical interview practice gap by 908B64B197 on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @05:07PM (#26405007)
> But we already do use credentials as gatekeeping. There's a lot of talk about bootcamps and whatnot, but how many of these people actually get passed the resume screen when compared to a Stanford CS grad?

At some point there's a signal to noise ratio issue here as well.

Re:The technical interview practice gap by jonathankoren on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:54PM (#26406085)
That's gatekeeping logic.
Re:The technical interview practice gap by sokoloff on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @07:42PM (#26406426)
Most every company I know would love to exploit any high-conversion, high-quality pocket of candidates.

If companies are passing on specific pockets, it’s likely from a belief that the conversion from top of funnel to successful hire is low.

Re:The technical interview practice gap by jonathankoren on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @11:53PM (#26407899)
Companies don’t examine their efforts. They copy off of each other. How many processes are simply aped with the excuse, “Well, BigCo does this, so it must be right”?

There’s plenty of excuses for gatekeeping, but the real reason is laziness. Of course, we don’t call it that, we call it a meritocracy and apply our biases as “common knowledge”, “proven”, or if we’re feeling particularly full of ourselves, a “sufficient statistic”, but never what it is: a bias, a blanket assumption, a gate.

As soon as you’re relying on assumptions, it’s not a meritocracy. It’s bias promotion, ie gatekeeping.