Re:How to Kill Bitcoin (Part 2)
by camjohnson26 on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @01:31PM
(#26401934)
Maybe but isn't it just as likely that people choose behavior they morally agree with? I have no strong feelings on Bitcoin right now, but I'd examine both arguments and choose to buy or not based on which side seemed stronger. If I chose to buy people could say I changed my beliefs to match my behavior, but really I chose my behavior to match my beliefs. Same if I chose not to buy.
Re:How to Kill Bitcoin (Part 2)
by munificent on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @02:14PM
(#26402616)
> Maybe but isn't it just as likely that people choose behavior they morally agree with?
Yes, but that moral interpretation is based on the framework they use to contextualize the behavior. Is cutting down a tree moral? Well, if it was a fire hazard next to an orphanage, maybe. If it was endangered and you were going to sell it for personal gain, probably not.
If you see a group of people describing something you yourself participate in as environmentally and economically destructive, you have to choose a framework in which to process that information. Some options are:
1. Sure it has some, ahem, negative externalities and I am somewhat bad for participating. But all of those people are just as compromised as me and they're only mad because they didn't get in first. I am no worse than them. If anything, I'm at least honest about my position.
2. They are right, I am selfishly participating in something that benefits me at the expense of the world.
The problem with 2 is that acknowledging and wanting to be morally correct forces you to change your behavior. So 1 is an easy pick. But that doesn't imply that it's correct.