News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by Sangama34 on Thursday March 04, 2021 @02:08AM (#26339541)
> Play stupid games and win stupid prices. No govt will surrender sovereignty and media control.

Why should government control the media ? That makes no sense.

Most of the social media giants lose money on their India operations while giving poor Indians an opportunity to have a better platform to express themselves. India has virtually seen a one party rule since independence, that too by a single family who could be more corrupt than all the south american dictators combined. The only way an ordinary tea seller could become a PM while defeating this party was because of power of social media are grassroot movement against corruption.

India has a history of screwing up what works without fully understanding the consequences of their regulations.

Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by naruvimama on Thursday March 04, 2021 @03:14AM (#26339967)
Are you implying big tech is involved in charity in India.

That makes it all the more worring. Subverting democracy at the behest of a foreign actor for pay.

Pay per tweet taken to a new level.

Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by sadfev on Thursday March 04, 2021 @03:03AM (#26339902)
Govt shouldn’t but they would want to.

The foreign social media sites have political agenda blatantly well “foreign”.

Media houses are strictly regulated and have to abide much stringent criteria for reporting or an oped.

It’s about control it was in the best interest of these tech firms to be “neutral” before they captured the entire public discourse space. That is clearly not the case now, They have infinitely more power than they had before and even more power than the sovereign government in many many countries.

Some governments are trying to protect their (digital) sovereignty through regulation.

Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by uniclaude on Thursday March 04, 2021 @01:48AM (#26339407)
The view that governments are necessarily trying to control information unless they’re dumb is not universally shared. This has little to do with surrendering sovereignty.
Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by A12-B on Thursday March 04, 2021 @02:04AM (#26339504)
Governments that want to keep their power have to control information. Every country does it differently, but they all do it.
Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by revendell_elf on Thursday March 04, 2021 @01:52AM (#26339435)
But the view that companies trying to censor and control information is universally acceptable, right? I think most the universe lies in the West.
Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by triceratops on Thursday March 04, 2021 @11:40AM (#26344619)
> control information

On their websites. You keep leaving that out. Facebook can't control what goes on Twitter and vice versa. But the government has power over both. That's why it's bad for the government to do it.

Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by bryanrasmussen on Thursday March 04, 2021 @02:05AM (#26339511)
there are philosophies of governance that do not expect governments to have media control.
[dead]
Re:India’s new intermediary liability and digital media laws... by revendell_elf on Thursday March 04, 2021 @01:49AM (#26339417)
He has been downvoted already. This is pretty much expected from "Experts from the West". And here I thought HN was unbiased.