News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Icons – Google Fonts by hunter2_ on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @09:24AM (#26328641)
If the image stands alone such that sighted users must parse it, then your logic is correct. But if the image is merely decorative due to adjacent text such that sighted users gloss over the image, aria-hidden affords users of screen readers that exact same efficiency instead of wasting their time.

In other words, eyes can skip over decorations without the developer needing to flag them as such, but audio can't auto-skip.

Re:Icons – Google Fonts by antpls on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @05:28PM (#26335679)
Wouldn't it make more sense to have everything "hidden" by default and have an explicit "aria-include" ?
Re:Icons – Google Fonts by hunter2_ on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @09:52PM (#26338032)
All text being skipped unless the author tags it for inclusion doesn't seem like a failsafe default, assuming that excessive information is generally preferred over insufficient information.