Re:Why Nuclear Must Be Part Of The Energy Solution (2018)
by jerome-jh on Monday March 01, 2021 @11:48AM
(#26304728)
India and China have a much larger population than Europe and the US. So the situation is not comparable to the time when Europe and the US did their industrial revolution. BRICs cannot act as if it is. There are many ways to apply pressure that are not necessarily adversarial. But of course if Europe does not lead the way in de-carbonating electricity it will automatically be perceived as adversarial.
Re:Why Nuclear Must Be Part Of The Energy Solution (2018)
by DaedPsyker on Monday March 01, 2021 @08:19AM
(#26302480)
It's not a fair comparison, coal was pretty much the only game in town and at a time when understanding of pollution only related to local level.
Yes its unfair but at the end of the day its the developing countries that will be hit hardest by climate change, not the west. I do agree we should subsidise clean energy around the world though.
Re:Why Nuclear Must Be Part Of The Energy Solution (2018)
by dispat0r on Monday March 01, 2021 @08:50AM
(#26302718)
wind energy is so cheap why are india and china still building new coal plants?
Re:Why Nuclear Must Be Part Of The Energy Solution (2018)
by pfdietz on Monday March 01, 2021 @01:06PM
(#26305868)
The wind resource in India is poor. Solar is likely the answer there, with batteries and hydrogen.
What we really have to do is to make alternatives so cheap and reliable, that coal looks like the stupid choice. Renewables can even be sold to certain poor areas (like deserts) as a great chance for an economic leap.