News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Skype down. Again. by amirrustam on Tuesday June 07, 2011 @01:17PM (#2629997)
If you use Skype's services extensively even before Microsoft came along, you would have noticed a lot of bugs (I know I did, and their support was meh), but they try. I would like to blame Microsoft for this, but I don't have any solid evidence to do so.

A lot of business's rely on Skype, so for them to just go out and say sorry is kind of bullshit. Where are the backup systems. There must be some process put it into place that compensates for situations like this. Maybe Microsoft can throw some coin at Skype now for a brand spankin new data center.

Re:Skype down. Again. by RobAtticus on Tuesday June 07, 2011 @01:49PM (#2630157)
Microsoft has not acquired Skype yet, so it doesn't make sense to try and blame them.
Re:Skype down. Again. by ohashi on Tuesday June 07, 2011 @01:20PM (#2630011)
Well until that major outage, I don't know how much infrastructure skype was running. I recall something about supernodes (or super super?) that they would be hosting to prevent these cascading failures. The whole P2P nature was the clever trick, not sure how much more data centers will actually help when it's software bugs that seem to take the system down.
Re:Skype down. Again. by bonzoesc on Tuesday June 07, 2011 @01:24PM (#2630028)
They've spun up "mega-supernodes," when cascading failures have taken the network down before[1], but they don't need to run them full-time, just when traffic is such that the traditional supernodes can't handle the traffic of a new network.

1: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2048630

Re:Skype down. Again. by ohashi on Tuesday June 07, 2011 @03:36PM (#2630536)
Thanks!