News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police misconduct settlements by GavinMcG on Sunday February 28, 2021 @02:52PM (#26296439)
What are you talking about? The comment dismissed what I had said about it mattering who we elect, in a shallow and narrowly-focused way. My characterization is indeed the opposite, because I disagree with the comment's premise. That's why I replied.
Re:Police misconduct settlements by alentist on Monday March 01, 2021 @11:42PM (#26311969)
Their comment: Things were bad during Obama's reign, as they were under Trump. Biden won't bring change, unless systemic change will be implemented.

Your response: I think your knee-jerk focus on who the president is (and denying the possibility of change) demonstrates what I was saying: the rhetoric has convinced people that it doesn't matter and it's all some national team sport.

Re:Police misconduct settlements by GavinMcG on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @08:39AM (#26315161)
Naming the three most recent presidents and denying that any of them did or could change things was meant as a direct counter to my claim that it matters who we elect. I replied by pointing out that "who we elect" isn't limited to the presidency.

It is entirely useless for you to quote each of us without clarifying what you've misinterpreted.

Re:Police misconduct settlements by alentist on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @07:48PM (#26323329)
"focus on who the president is" is the opposite of what they said.

"denying the possibility of change" is the opposite of what they did.