News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by iamatologist on Sunday February 28, 2021 @08:04AM (#26293139)
Does an application need to prove it can do what it claims to do before it can be ported to OpenBSD? Seems like a high bar. :-)
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by dvfjsdhgfv on Sunday February 28, 2021 @08:26AM (#26293262)
It's not a high bar, just plain honesty. I remember a while ago someone was promoting a language called v, making many claims of which some turned out completely untrue. This might be a norm in commercial software - some people believe that you can't sell anything if you don't exaggerate - but the open source world in general prefers a more honest approach. Hence many projects always remaining at 0.x release, for example.
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by spacemanmatt on Sunday February 28, 2021 @08:40AM (#26293338)
It is a high bar that makes OpenBSD in security-sensitive roles way more appealing than a distribution with a lower bar. That high bar paid for itself repeatedly when I ran OpenBSD in the late 90s and early 2000s.
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by tyingq on Sunday February 28, 2021 @09:21AM (#26293573)
That's true, but not for the ports collection. There's all sorts of software there with historically bad track records in security. That's the point...it's just ports of a bunch of popular software.
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by iamatologist on Sunday February 28, 2021 @09:08AM (#26293502)
Fair enough.