News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are... by onlyrealcuzzo on Friday February 26, 2021 @03:11PM (#26279308)
Wasn't Incognito pretty much built so you could go to PornHub without every time you type P in your address bar it shows everyone looking at your screen what kind of porn you're into?

Did Incognito give anyone any indication that it was somehow making you untrackable? It just meant that the browser itself wasn't storing what you were doing.

Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are... by vngzs on Friday February 26, 2021 @03:29PM (#26279494)
Incognito mode includes the following text on the new tab screen:

> Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won't see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved.

> Chrome won't save the following information: Your browsing history, Cookies and site data, Information entered in forms

> Your activity might still be visible to: Websites you visit, Your employer or school, Your internet service provider.

I'm normally a pretty pro-digital privacy person, because I believe the odds are stacked against average consumers to an unimaginable degree. That said, I don't believe incognito mode is misleading about what it achieves. I think it's pretty upfront about what it does and what it doesn't do.

Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are... by Nemo_bis on Saturday February 27, 2021 @04:50AM (#26283776)
It would be interesting to see counterproofs to the claim that "other people who use this device won't see your activity". They might not see it in Chrome, but what if I search pregnancy tests and then another user of the same device sees Google Ads for pregnancy tests, or for baby products? They'll reasonably infer someone was looking for them and this might put lives in danger.

The example is not theoretical: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2021/01/...