News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by throwawaysea on Thursday February 25, 2021 @11:06AM (#26264304)
Why is one group (union activists) allowed to take such action but the other group isn't? I am not sure I see anything "scummy" in this.
Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by sodality2 on Thursday February 25, 2021 @11:18AM (#26264473)
They are allowed to. That is why they did. Just as I am allowed to call them scummy for it
Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by fastball on Thursday February 25, 2021 @12:22PM (#26265297)
You know what they meant. Why is one scummy and the other not?
Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by sodality2 on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:13PM (#26266866)
Amazon is strong-arming workers into voting no with propaganda posters, unions typically hurt amazon (else why would they fight so hard against it), and typically help the workers. Do you not see the problem here? I don't mean to say unions are always right. I see anti-union sentiment from the very company that would be hurt by it to be very much allowed. But since I believe in worker's rights and can see firsthand how poorly they are treated, I see it as scummy.
Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by s1artibartfast on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:27PM (#26267063)
Just to be clear, this is a double standard based on your priors.

Vote No propaganda is bad because unions are good.

Vote Yes propaganda is good because unions are good.

If you are not convinced that unions age good in the first place, then it all falls apart.

Re:Amazon Sends ‘Vote No’ Instructions to Unionizing Employees by sodality2 on Friday February 26, 2021 @08:12AM (#26274389)
>Just to be clear, this is a double standard based on your priors.

>Vote No propaganda is bad because unions are good.

>Vote Yes propaganda is good because unions are good.

Double standard? Not really. Definitely not the peak of critical reasoning, though. But I'm not judging anti-union vs pro-union propaganda by anything but their motives.

>If you are not convinced that unions age good in the first place, then it all falls apart.

Ah, but I do. Not inherently, and not always. But net positive in my opinion. Sure, if I change my beliefs to contradict, it will not make sense. Just as if I believed unions were bad and net negative, union propaganda would be considered scummy but amazon propaganda wouldn't.

I always try to judge critically, and in my personal opinion, pro vs anti has a clear benefit for the worker on one side. This doesn't mean I think the other shouldn't exist. I don't think that means a double standard, since in my eyes they aren't the same. If they were literally the same, say Amazon wanted the Yankees to win and the workers wanted the Red Sox to win, and I insisted on one side over the other, then it would be a double standard (like 1984, they do it = bad, we do the same thing = good).